Archives Posts
December 31st, 2008 by J. Celestino
So after a weekend hanging with friends in Texas I had a bunch of random footage. All taken with the movie mode of my little cybershot camera. So I took all that footage and tried my best to make a cohesive thing out of it. Anyway this is the result, nicely filled with cliches. It’s a small film for my friends.
http://www.vimeo.com/2682027
Archives Posts
December 25th, 2008 by J. Celestino
For some reason my family decides to make an exorbitant amount of food during the holidays. While all the cooking was going on, kept wondering why I need to make enough potatoes for 20 or a giant ham. The sad thing was that I had not enjoyed a holiday with my family in a long time and I had forgotten exactly what it was like. There are only five of us but we had enough food for about 35 people, I would say. Here is the amazing thing about my family, they make that much for not just for themselves but for others. During these Holiday’s there is an endless stream of visitors that come to visit my parents and pay their respects and all the food is mainly for all of them. Through out the day people would come in and have some ham or potatoes or a tamale. Or they just came to enjoy one of the many deserts that were made. We had enough sugar filled dishes to kill a small room of diabetics. Needless to say I had simply forgotten what it was like to have so many family members and family friends nearby. I had forgot the very nature of my culture but I quickly got into the groove of giving hugs and kissing cheeks. I miss this type of living from time to time but I do not miss this place itself. However, I’m willing to survive on these brief remberences of culture as I continue to search for something larger than myself.
Archives Posts
December 15th, 2008 by J. Celestino
Archives Posts
December 7th, 2008 by J. Celestino
I’ve just returned from seeing Synecdoche, the latest Charlie Kaufman movie, and I enjoyed the movie quite a bit, some parts are truely hilarious. However I doubt many will. As a matter of fact several comments from neighboring patrons included “I’m glad it’s over” and “What the hell was that all about?” Two people behind us decided to leave near the end, oddly about 15 minutes till the end. Why not stay till the punctuation mark?
Anyway, why they left: The movie is a classic example of postmodernism, throwing the sequence of time out the window as well as being rather self referential. Someone not accustomed to the genre or Kaufman films in general would find the movie hard to follow. Ironically I enjoyed the film for the very reasons that some left. I found it interesting and well layered but about the beginning of the second act I noticed a surprising similarity to Six Characters in Search of an Author. Which gave me a basis for understanding the movie without much explanation. So I spent the movie admiring the details as I no longer had to pay attention to the road signs. I think that is the key to Kaufman movies.
It was enjoyable and interesting, my only wish was that it didn’t hand it to you on a silver platter at the end. He decided to simply beat you over the head with the message at the end like so many art films I wanted to enjoy. Children of Men is a good example of this. Small spoiler: I wanted the movie to end when Hoffman gets the role of Ellen near the end, just after he enters the door.
Watch the trailer and if you are into a slightly tougher read, then give it a go.
Archives Posts
December 4th, 2008 by J. Celestino
I stumbled across this short film on the internets and I liked its premise. This idea of finding a common ground between intellectual and social classes.
I’ve been having small conversations about how the labor worker is endangered in this country for a while now. Moreover thanks to technology and necessity there will be a need for more and more knowledge workers. Which we are currently at a deficit, I believe. Mainly because we’ve made it terribly difficult to become a creative knowledge worker. First, its expensive and second, we tend to pinhole a specific discipline and beat them over the head with it. So much so that it begins to dominate their lives. Architects that believe everything is Architecture, because of the very nature of the metaphor. We build relationships and design the very boundaries of our existence, etc… In every discipline as the focus becomes narrower I think a persons entire scope also becomes narrow and they believe that all life subsists of their discipline. Which is an easy correlation to make but we make it at the sacrifice of the myriad of possibilities from every other discipline. Artists love to believe that what they do and what a mathematician does is hugely different. When we know for a fact that both are interrelated. The golden ratio is a prime example as it relates to aesthetics. More over plenty of mathematicians can submit to the idea that a proof can be elegant or even beautiful. Using terms of aesthetics to describe mathematics. Sometimes science becomes more about creativity, rather than logic. Take string theory for example which states that all possibilities exists and are collapsed to a reality by an observer. Granted that being a rather simplistic statement of a particular part of string theory, nonetheless it almost sounds like philosophy rather than physics. These field experts are knowledge workers but they work at a deficit of interdisciplinary knowledge. Which is why collaboration is so important. But what if we were able to collaborate in our own heads as well as with other people. What if an Artist could put down the paint brush and discuss metallurgy or the kazimir effect. Or a chemist having a conversation on color theory or Calvino’s Lightness. What if we found a common ground in our own heads, would it be easier to talk to each other? Would the conversation be good?